linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext3 tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:55:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100525215552.GA12633@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100522154532.bc0f8008.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

  Hi Stephen,

On Sat 22-05-10 15:45:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the ext3 tree got a conflict in fs/super.c
> between commits b20bd1a5e78af267dc4b6e1ffed48d5d776302c5 ("get rid of
> S_BIAS"), 1712ac8fda7d8bc4dc921f5777b7423aacad7263 ("Saner locking around
> deactivate_super()") and e1e46bf1866317d4f86f66bf18d3f07317d9f9ee ("Trim
> includes in fs/super.c") from Linus' tree and commits
> c3134141c78d5ea233a08b703b553e70cfb5c585 ("quota: move unmount handling
> into the filesystem") and cdb89ca659f5a39edf88f3c55e545ea3347533d1
> ("quota: explicitly set ->dq_op and ->s_qcop") from the ext3 tree.
  Thanks! I've now rebased for_next branch on recent Linus's tree and
so this conflict should go away.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-25 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-22  5:45 linux-next: manual merge of the ext3 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-25 21:55 ` Jan Kara [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-02  0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-10  1:22 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-10 12:01 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-18  0:32 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100525215552.GA12633@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).