From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:28:44 +1000 Message-ID: <20100526172844.4e5b5408.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20100526114406.d3a68d1f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__26_May_2010_17_28_44_+1000_u3O.IYng6KKdhPpu" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:37582 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751170Ab0EZH2w (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 03:28:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Wed__26_May_2010_17_28_44_+1000_u3O.IYng6KKdhPpu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Miklos, On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:46:46 +0200 Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > Oops, missed one patch, and forgot to test with modular kernel. It's > now fixed in the for-next branch. Thanks. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Wed__26_May_2010_17_28_44_+1000_u3O.IYng6KKdhPpu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkv8zawACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wsewCgorTzQUKl+Nwpi9YgNwZsILRa lVUAnRyhzaxDNLNgAznNDTWwtttHjlp4 =vCO0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__26_May_2010_17_28_44_+1000_u3O.IYng6KKdhPpu--