From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:54:55 +1000 Message-ID: <20100713105455.e49afeb9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__13_Jul_2010_10_54_55_+1000_lf8yi6Qod6KDRr+j" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:36931 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753860Ab0GMAzB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:55:01 -0400 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__13_Jul_2010_10_54_55_+1000_lf8yi6Qod6KDRr+j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kukjin, Today's linux-next merge of the s5p tree got a conflict in arch/arm/configs/s5pc110_defconfig between commit 07a8c03f3e06129e847acd068b8b89c13357ee64 ("ARM: reduce defconfigs") from Linus' tree and commit 2976beb1dd86974ae98a992ca23a626f8be7e7dd ("ARM: s5pv210_defconfig: Update for removing s5pc110_defconfig") from the s5p tree. The latter just removes the file, so I did that. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__13_Jul_2010_10_54_55_+1000_lf8yi6Qod6KDRr+j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMO7lfAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbsc4EIAJEZEv6h6ZIWMcFtUbj50giz A7J/HjTrfSqqzjCV2a5uQJM9nVgGF5KIqrGDT+zPlZyMAlafAfW8C6Ee5JHohOCs vwE/GXj5OU1n4G0r90/aaGZNIQSbN125klLrIMGASN86bLJshjnWPNp9hYpgMByq qHXPL3hsFXvAKI23p8BXs35Q1/ZDj6Z0TcUc3fuFr+AC47gDyKQ4G9/4PcPJtoeA cTmuoP/qdYkoEqzJ/x3kENLaBMj/HoFp9io/3wd9i5f3DLx/N4jQhYUlqedh4SYQ D97b3cotMTaUM1bu3v4Zhw1PDMV4Pv3je80nNXudgbYy1il5GcQ2rSG52AQAc3Q= =cbaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__13_Jul_2010_10_54_55_+1000_lf8yi6Qod6KDRr+j--