From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
JiebingLi <jiebing.li@intel.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the trivial tree
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:06:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100902200604.GC16897@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1009021633020.26813@pobox.suse.cz>
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/langwell_udc.c between commit
> > > 7f26b3a7533bbc1ddd88b297c935ee4da8f74cea ("drivers/usb: Remove
> > > unnecessary return's from void functions") from the trivial tree and
> > > commit 0f92bbacd2d1a26e8bf863d2cc05572df43bf7fb ("USB: langwell: USB
> > > Client driver code cleanup") from the usb tree.
> > >
> > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix
> > > while necessary. Though, if that trivial tree commit was in the usb tree,
> > > the conflict could be resolved there ...
> >
> > Joe, care to break this one change out and have me take it through the
> > usb tree?
>
> Here it goes. I will revert this chunk in trivial tree for now.
Thanks, I've applied it to my tree now.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-02 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 3:01 linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the trivial tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-02 3:26 ` Greg KH
2010-09-02 14:34 ` Jiri Kosina
2010-09-02 20:06 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-14 2:28 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-14 4:08 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-06 3:35 ` Greg KH
2010-10-06 6:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-10-06 14:05 ` Greg KH
2010-10-07 7:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-10-06 9:36 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100902200604.GC16897@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jiebing.li@intel.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).