From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the trivial tree Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:06:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20100902200604.GC16897@kroah.com> References: <20100902130118.add62d4a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100902032604.GB27598@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, JiebingLi , Joe Perches List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in > > > drivers/usb/gadget/langwell_udc.c between commit > > > 7f26b3a7533bbc1ddd88b297c935ee4da8f74cea ("drivers/usb: Remove > > > unnecessary return's from void functions") from the trivial tree and > > > commit 0f92bbacd2d1a26e8bf863d2cc05572df43bf7fb ("USB: langwell: USB > > > Client driver code cleanup") from the usb tree. > > > > > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix > > > while necessary. Though, if that trivial tree commit was in the usb tree, > > > the conflict could be resolved there ... > > > > Joe, care to break this one change out and have me take it through the > > usb tree? > > Here it goes. I will revert this chunk in trivial tree for now. Thanks, I've applied it to my tree now. greg k-h