From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:33:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20100923023315.GA10764@fieldses.org> References: <20100923113429.88f865d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:56417 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751015Ab0IWCer (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:34:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100923113429.88f865d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > ERROR: ".get_task_comm" [fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko] undefined! > > Caused by commit c67874f942e30039442d925b03793e0a46ddcddd ("nfsd: > formally deprecate legacy nfsd syscall interface"). > > get_task_comm is not exported to modules. > > I have used the version of the nfsd tree from next-20100921 for today. Oops, thanks. It looks like a lot of places just do a printk("%s using deprecated interface ...", current->comm); so maybe we can get away with just that? --b.