From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the i.MX tree Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:31:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20100930033110.GA5762@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20100930112302.e554d367.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:47248 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752725Ab0I3Daz (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:30:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100930112302.e554d367.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Sascha Hauer On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The former removed that code that the latter changed. I just used the > former. > The latter was just changing some names, so ti may be able to be > integrated into the former. Though doing that would break bisection. The other option would be to revert the bit of the multi-component change that does the rename which I think should be safe - Sacha, Liam, does that seem sensible? There is the issue with other potential non-audio users of the SSI to be considered.