From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 4 Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:11:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20101005191152.GA14151@suse.de> References: <20101004113638.a7f8517b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49602.216.212.242.109.1286305155.squirrel@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57465 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753802Ab0JETMY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:12:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49602.216.212.242.109.1286305155.squirrel@xenotime.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Zimny Lech , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:59:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Mon, October 4, 2010 10:48 pm, Zimny Lech wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > 2010/10/4 Stephen Rothwell : > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> > >> This tree is not as well tested as others since it was only built after > >> all the merges had been done. > > > > Randy said that he had already sent a patch for this > > > > > > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c: In function > > 'get_device_parent': > > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:634:3: error: 'block_class' > > undeclared (first use in this function) > > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:634:3: note: each undeclared > > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c: In function > > 'device_add_class_symlinks': > > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:723:2: error: 'block_class' > > undeclared (first use in this function) > > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c: In function > > 'device_remove_class_symlinks': > > /home/test/linux-2.6/drivers/base/core.c:751:2: error: 'block_class' > > undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [drivers/base/core.o] > > Error 1 > > make[2]: *** [drivers/base] Error 2 > > make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2 > > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > > I sure did, but Greg may be backlogged or just ignoring it. backlogged, I was in Tokyo last week, catching up now... thanks, greg k-h