From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the trivial tree Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:05:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20101006140556.GA19537@kroah.com> References: <20101006141414.abf7431f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101006061927.GA2659@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101006061927.GA2659@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Joe Perches , Jiri Kosina , Sergei Shtylyov List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 09:19:27AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:14:14PM -0500, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >Hi Greg, > > > >Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in > >drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c between commit > >7f26b3a7533bbc1ddd88b297c935ee4da8f74cea ("drivers/usb: Remove > >unnecessary return's from void functions") from the trivial tree and > > funny that I wasn't CCed to that one :-( It was 'trivial' patches, which don't always get sent to the individual developer unfortunately. sorry, greg k-h