From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with the tip tree Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:51:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20101012125126.GE12335@console-pimps.org> References: <20101012131828.5fedf1bf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101012060327.GA13409@console-pimps.org> <20101012232349.938f83c0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101012232349.938f83c0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Robert Richter , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Helsley , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:23:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:03:27 +0100 Matt Fleming wrote: > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > pevent = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&counter_config[event].attr, > > > - cpu, -1, > > > + cpu, NULL1, > > > op_overflow_handler); > > > > Is that a typo? Shouldn't that be NULL, and not NULL1? > > Yes, its a typo in my patch :-( . I will fix it for tomorrow. Sorry about that. Not a problem! Thanks