From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Section msimatch warnings Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20101025.162724.71111412.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20101024.222602.71095343.davem@davemloft.net> <20101025103636.442e108a@nehalam> <20101026100427.f7c30b3d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43704 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751305Ab0JYX1B (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:27:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101026100427.f7c30b3d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jchapman@katalix.com From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:04:27 +1100 > This is actually different - it is generated by the compiler. I am not > sure why we only get them on PowerPC. I think it has to do with how function descriptors work on powerpc. Code references to static (local) things work different from how global scope references work.