From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the swiotlb-xen tree with the tip tree Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:47:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20101026144728.GE9557@dumpdata.com> References: <20101026130332.002937e5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:62549 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752527Ab0JZOtz (ORCPT >); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:49:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101026130332.002937e5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Dirk Brandewie On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:03:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Konrad, > > Today's linux-next merge of the swiotlb-xen tree got a conflict in > arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h between commit > 23f9b267159b4c7ff59d2e6c8ed31693eff841e3 ("x86: apic: Move > probe_nr_irqs_gsi() into ioapic_init_mappings()") from the tip tree and > commit 7b586d71858091f0958e5808b7e3d5390c2ae47d ("x86/io_apic: add > get_nr_irqs_gsi()") from the swiotlb-xen tree. > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as > necessary. Thank you.