From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:14:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20101119.131443.35039425.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20101119111706.d68efe13.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44799 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751544Ab0KSVOS (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:14:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101119111706.d68efe13.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:17:06 +1100 > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c between commit > 3006bc38895895f1a0352c2e17e1a503f35f7e2f ("bonding: fix a race in IGMP > handling") from the net-current tree and commit > 866f3b25a2eb60d7529c227a0ecd80c3aba443fd ("bonding: IGMP handling > cleanup") from the net tree. > > I just assumed that the latter is a better solution and used that. Yep, that's correct, and I'm doing the same as I merge things myself right now. Thanks!