From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: linux-next: unsigned commits Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:34:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20101206233458.GA3738@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20101207103346.fbbcf099.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101207103346.fbbcf099.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:33:46AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Looking through the drivers-x86 tree update for linux-next today, I found > a few commits that have no signed-off-by line ... > > 8f2e88b22a4caaebcc8d5a9e00a8249fec350cf3 "Generic key reporting" > e3a2b10707902bcf95d022a5bab8f13b26bccc64 "ACPI-ify" > 52f4e59f269e0d3bb1d54ca654d9cbf6880e7370 "Fix some tos1900 devices" > 64ea4efdd949c99d9206a44a43984d2e861350f1 "wwan rfkill stubs" > > And I think those commit messages could do with some elaboration as well. They're somewhat WIP - I'll shift them to a topic branch. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org