From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: linux-next: not a good commit message in i.MX tree Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:57:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20101210085705.GU6017@pengutronix.de> References: <20101210092457.a6942195.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:48943 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754345Ab0LJI5I (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:57:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101210092457.a6942195.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:24:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > Looking through the updates for linux-next today I noticed commit 3ed005593e9a8aa9183c9e827ca0f68a685f25a9 whose whole commit message is: > > blibb > > Please write a better one. Uh, the whole patch shouldn't be there. I accidently merged some temporary branch. Thanks for noting. I fixed this. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |