Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:44:18AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:55:54PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:52:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > >On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:05:27AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >>>On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:08:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > >>>>On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:01:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >>>>>Hi Greg,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in
> > >>>>>drivers/usb/musb/blackfin.c drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> > >>>>>drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h between commit
> > >>>>>1e393c6eece048052d4131ec4dad3b98e35a98e2 ("USB: musb: blackfin: pm: make
> > >>>>>it work") from Linus' tree (v2.6.37-rc2) and various commits from the usb
> > >>>>>tree.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>It was not immediately obvious how to fix these up, so I just used the
> > >>>>>versions from the usb tree.  This may not be correct and it would be good
> > >>>>>if this was fixed properly in the usb tree.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Hm.  Felipe, I'll merge in the -rc4 tree into usb-next if it makes sense
> > >>>>to do so now, can you send me the patch that ends up being the correct
> > >>>>merge?
> > >>>
> > >>>Sure, I'll check it now and send in a patch in a few minutes.
> > >>
> > >>There are two commits you didn't have in your usb-next branch which are
> > >>in mainline. Reverting them will make greg/usb-next apply cleanly on top
> > >>of v2.6.47-rc4. The commits are:
> > >>
> > >>32d5dc9520f0c6f60f691dd478741c774e292406 : USB: musb: pm: don't rely fully on clock support
> > >>1e393c6eece048052d4131ec4dad3b98e35a98e2 : USB: musb: blackfin: pm: make it work
> > >>
> > >>Do you want me to rebase on top of -rc4 or is reverting those two enough
> > >>for you ? As a sidenote, the series I sent you already fixes those two
> > >>cases as we moved PM and clock handling entirely to glue layer, so those
> > >>two cases are taken care of on the series, reverting those patches won't
> > >>pose any regressions.
> > >
> > >So, I should do the following things:
> > >	take -rc6
> > >	revert the above commits
> > >	merge with usb-next
> > >	push out
> > >
> > >and all should be good, right?  If so, that's fine with me, I'll do it
> > 
> > Perfect, I just tried again just to be sure Merges cleanly:
> > 
> > commit 6033eb6e16e602f97ac5b6424ef71c8e464ececc
> > Merge: fa05820 0b83ae9
> > Author: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > Date:   Thu Dec 16 17:55:14 2010 +0200
> > 
> >     Merge remote-tracking branch 'greg/usb-next' into linus
> 
> Great, will go do this now...

Ok, now merged and pushed out.  Stephen, there shouldn't be any merge
errors with the next linux-next and the usb-next branches anymore.

thanks,

greg k-h