From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:14:29 -0800 Message-ID: <20101216181429.GA19012@kroah.com> References: <20101216140122.ca745f1f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101216030857.GA12785@kroah.com> <20101216080527.GA2601@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20101216084552.GD2601@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20101216155225.GA31363@kroah.com> <20101216155554.GA9552@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20101216174418.GA3849@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101216174418.GA3849@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bob Liu , Mike Frysinger List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:44:18AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:55:54PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:52:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > >On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >>On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:05:27AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > >>>On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:08:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > >>>>On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:01:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >>>>>Hi Greg, > > >>>>> > > >>>>>Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in > > >>>>>drivers/usb/musb/blackfin.c drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c > > >>>>>drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h between commit > > >>>>>1e393c6eece048052d4131ec4dad3b98e35a98e2 ("USB: musb: blackfin: pm: make > > >>>>>it work") from Linus' tree (v2.6.37-rc2) and various commits from the usb > > >>>>>tree. > > >>>>> > > >>>>>It was not immediately obvious how to fix these up, so I just used the > > >>>>>versions from the usb tree. This may not be correct and it would be good > > >>>>>if this was fixed properly in the usb tree. > > >>>> > > >>>>Hm. Felipe, I'll merge in the -rc4 tree into usb-next if it makes sense > > >>>>to do so now, can you send me the patch that ends up being the correct > > >>>>merge? > > >>> > > >>>Sure, I'll check it now and send in a patch in a few minutes. > > >> > > >>There are two commits you didn't have in your usb-next branch which are > > >>in mainline. Reverting them will make greg/usb-next apply cleanly on top > > >>of v2.6.47-rc4. The commits are: > > >> > > >>32d5dc9520f0c6f60f691dd478741c774e292406 : USB: musb: pm: don't rely fully on clock support > > >>1e393c6eece048052d4131ec4dad3b98e35a98e2 : USB: musb: blackfin: pm: make it work > > >> > > >>Do you want me to rebase on top of -rc4 or is reverting those two enough > > >>for you ? As a sidenote, the series I sent you already fixes those two > > >>cases as we moved PM and clock handling entirely to glue layer, so those > > >>two cases are taken care of on the series, reverting those patches won't > > >>pose any regressions. > > > > > >So, I should do the following things: > > > take -rc6 > > > revert the above commits > > > merge with usb-next > > > push out > > > > > >and all should be good, right? If so, that's fine with me, I'll do it > > > > Perfect, I just tried again just to be sure Merges cleanly: > > > > commit 6033eb6e16e602f97ac5b6424ef71c8e464ececc > > Merge: fa05820 0b83ae9 > > Author: Felipe Balbi > > Date: Thu Dec 16 17:55:14 2010 +0200 > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'greg/usb-next' into linus > > Great, will go do this now... Ok, now merged and pushed out. Stephen, there shouldn't be any merge errors with the next linux-next and the usb-next branches anymore. thanks, greg k-h