From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the s5p tree Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:53:39 +1100 Message-ID: <20101223115339.1ce18216.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__23_Dec_2010_11_53_39_+1100_PDcxb8+.dBd15KbN" Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jassi Brar , Kukjin Kim List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Thu__23_Dec_2010_11_53_39_+1100_PDcxb8+.dBd15KbN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Takashi, Today's linux-next merge of the sound tree got a conflict in sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580.c sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm9713.c between commit 7ca825bed699c77b218ead402202df384556950b ("ASoC: Samsung: Rename DMA device") from the s5p tree and various commits from the sound tree. I used the versions from the sound tree that seemed to be supersets of the ones from the s5p tree. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__23_Dec_2010_11_53_39_+1100_PDcxb8+.dBd15KbN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNEp2TAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbs3yIIAJ/UbAxeZV9rHDtY3KKIslTV x9FyE6Kg0D9kKTBsPG5W50/FfQoF1ny8dk1WLoqyOlvlhdcZa4InsKsC1wuQcTFs xKUBI0w1oCkcKJb8klBZvl5/Y9f/8Fl5H/kTdc3scc/b/yTWFjUT4H88gna88VPs UfQVs0PDKV3qP/NOwpdqXdubnm9xBewEf9pXTthPvtwRdvQ58LYOC3CiiOMDkvgw WBdiSuLhn6ZxvxScsLKwI3PiqJFy8wbbv9PJK9N3VlbHGV/Iv+mB+FOGBaeqdnZJ b9/aVB+Pceg/en54iDyEj0Vufe33Rk7xG/O/YRfNi2hQ+alzbeF3Te8LGaFA8fg= =2R4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__23_Dec_2010_11_53_39_+1100_PDcxb8+.dBd15KbN--