From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:00:45 +1100 Message-ID: <20101229210045.f583c18d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20101229130700.0ef93735.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__29_Dec_2010_21_00_45_+1100_OkMLQweS=K0_pN7Y" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:50467 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751001Ab0L2KAw (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:00:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Sedat Dilek , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML --Signature=_Wed__29_Dec_2010_21_00_45_+1100_OkMLQweS=K0_pN7Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sedat, On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:54:28 +0100 Sedat Dilek = wrote: > > What is the recommended way in case of these "comparison" warnings? > Send to whom/where? Their respective maintainers (see scripts/get_maintainer.pl), unless you can also identify the commit that introduced the warning, then you should also cc author(s), Thanks --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Wed__29_Dec_2010_21_00_45_+1100_OkMLQweS=K0_pN7Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNGwbNAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbs4nIH/iTFx7jwT0er6heOi6LLyEtl 2acEBBwf8x7NkCLyx8W2few1ORyt1iZWCKoICTS/4+7Tr6VKj/FOc+KUGU+LWJq4 N86X9HRFxKMSk9FxvOZ2cI2sqNqQS7njWHjmtyar3ruWI2kjf/p29jmtLs3m/k2X oq5tRDebUI5wRYVst8odgtfkG2gRtiZpVb/36bS6tA+6SsFBpyRCxPapaJQz/dAJ OmLK4yPOms9DYnB/RoR6Wjs2p0KJP2CG5zVhIrVviX/YOVWkuMepy4rXbvhu39hi s2D7aFmo63smzp2A/5zGN0cthmR2NZdkMNxsTCtT8p9ur9u0Z7hYI96fz06RKik= =Pmi+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__29_Dec_2010_21_00_45_+1100_OkMLQweS=K0_pN7Y--