From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:05:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20110131170506.GA11939@dumpdata.com> References: <20110131174113.8199f901.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:41797 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751858Ab1AaRGO (ORCPT >); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:06:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110131174113.8199f901.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:41:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20110121: > > New tree: unicore32 > > Renamed tree: swiotlb-xen to xen-two Sweet. Thank you. > > Dropped tree: xen Uh, why? Jeremy's tree should be OK now? Did something not compile correctly?