From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the
 staging.current tree
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:47:26 -0800
Message-ID: <20110131184726.GB17755@kroah.com>
References: <20110131161640.93d8688a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110131161640.93d8688a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:16:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c between commit
> f32b8453e5a5587ae112ba478ae0bbad74e83d22 ("Staging: ste_rmi4: use after
> input_unregister_device()") from the staging.current tree and commit
> dc7b202a4ee6cb686e2bbef80c84443f43ec91bd ("staging/ste_rmi4: Remove
> obsolete cleanup for clientdata") from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Thanks, that looks correct to me.  I'll apply this when Linus syncs up
with my staging-linus tree.

greg k-h