From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:52:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20110211095218.GQ3770@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20110211145810.bdea73a3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:37969 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755425Ab1BKJwY (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:52:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110211145810.bdea73a3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Beulich , Shaohua Li , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:58:10PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in > arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S between commit > 94d1ac8b55799be10487fff9766cce6d6628462a ("x86: Reduce back the alignment > of the per-CPU data section") from the tip tree and commit > 19df0c2fef010e94e90df514aaf4e73f6b80145c ("percpu: align percpu > readmostly subsection to cacheline") from the percpu tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Thanks. Looks good to me. -- tejun