From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the acpi tree Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:29:52 +0100 Message-ID: <201102241129.53232.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20110224155221.4f35f728.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:54692 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753025Ab1BXKaU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 05:30:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110224155221.4f35f728.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown On Thursday, February 24, 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c between commit > a69fa313606a51cee99d802c14895330948f60c8 ("ACPI / PM: Drop > acpi_restore_state_mem()") from the acpi tree and commit > d1ee433539ea5963a8f946f3428b335d1c5fdb20 ("x86, trampoline: Use the > unified trampoline setup for ACPI wakeup") from the tip tree. > > Just context (I think). Yes. The ACPI tree renames a function that the x86 tree modifies. > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Please do, thanks!