From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-config tree with the tty tree Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 00:16:53 +0100 Message-ID: <201103020016.53993.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20110228174007.b6faf01e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <201103012324.27725.arnd@arndb.de> <20110302101357.7d2a3d81.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110302101357.7d2a3d81.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 02 March 2011 00:13:57 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:24:27 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I have cleared the branch in my repository now, since the contents > > were very outdated. I have a newer branch named 'final' with all the patches > > that are needed on top of -next to kill the BKL for good. > > Thanks for that. > > > I'll send the patches out for review again and if everyone is happy, > > I can update the config branch so they get into -next. Small update: I've added part of the series to the config branch already, just the patches that already have Acked-by:s from the maintainers, but no other tree to go through. > So can I remove the bkl-trivial, bkl-llseek and bkl-vfs trees? Yes. Arnd