From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:14:23 -0800 Message-ID: <20110304171423.GG22173@kroah.com> References: <20110304163915.f0b3f60e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110304163915.f0b3f60e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil , Tomas Winkler List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:39:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/easycap/easycap_ioctl.c between commit > 0ff69fe7cebb65856eba7feb3fd76fb4ba365bf8 ("[media] v4l: removal of old, > obsolete ioctls") from the v4l-dvb tree and commits > f62bc44e055712fc8ccf34654a79137dd4a4d8af ("staging/easycap: remove > obsolete VIDIOC_S_CTRL_OLD ioctl") and > 50e1fbdc1c9965b6ddbc5c9900377ff18bbf9ae8 ("staging/easycap: add first > level indentation to easycap_ioctl.c") from the staging tree. > > The latter two were a superset of the former, so I used that. Thanks, that looks correct. greg k-h