From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:30:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20110316123030.68bdbdcb@endymion.delvare> References: <20110315192428.ce74a177.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4D7F2609.3080508@redhat.com> <20110315103228.30233acc@endymion.delvare> <20110315212226.7e940b51.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:3662 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751853Ab1CPLaz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:30:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110315212226.7e940b51.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Hans de Goede , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:22:26 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jean, > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:32:28 +0100 Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > Stephen, sorry for the inconvenience, both Hans and myself build-tested > > the new code on an architecture where gets included > > implicitly, so we didn't notice it was missing. > > It happens. It seems that delay.h is almost always the one that is > forgotten. X86 builds include it implicitly but powerpc doesn't. > > I wonder if we could concoct a nice checkpatch test for it. Would certainly be a good idea, yes. Probably not trivial though. -- Jean Delvare