From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:45:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110325144544.GF1409@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110325125643.91510e0e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Hello, Stephen, Ted.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:56:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the ext4 tree got a conflict in
> fs/ext4/super.c between commit fd89d5f2030a ("ext4: convert to
> alloc_workqueue()") from Linus' tree and commit 198868f35de9 ("ext4: Use
> single thread to perform DIO unwritten convertion") from the ext4 tree.
>
> I just used the ext4 tree version.
Both are about the same conversion but the one using alloc_workqueue()
is better because 1. create_singlethread_workqueue() is going away and
2. it doesn't require strict ordering among queued works.
Ted, what do you think?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-25 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-25 1:56 linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-25 14:45 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-03-25 16:30 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-03-25 19:58 ` Ted Ts'o
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-27 0:39 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-27 6:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-27 7:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-07 0:27 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-17 23:12 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-20 23:03 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-19 11:44 Mark Brown
2016-03-21 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-13 1:33 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-14 2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-28 0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-22 5:50 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-17 1:56 linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-17 13:22 ` Theodore Tso
2009-09-17 13:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-02 2:56 linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110325144544.GF1409@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tytso@MIT.EDU \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).