From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110419.004108.246512359.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110419131618.a474326a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38379 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795Ab1DSHln (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:41:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110419131618.a474326a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yanivr@broadcom.com, shemminger@vyatta.com From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:16:18 +1000 > Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethtool.c between commit 70dda99c41fc ("bnx2x: > Fix port identification problem") from the net-current tree and commit > 32d3613475d8 ("bnx2x: convert to set_phys_id") from the net tree. > > I fixed it up (maybe - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Your conflict resolution was pretty much perfect :-) I've merged net-2.6 into net-next-2.6 to fix this up. Thanks!