From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the tree Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:03:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20110513080327.GC12058@linux-mips.org> References: <20110513131044.499e82d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:33779 "EHLO duck.linux-mips.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757787Ab1EMIC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 04:02:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110513131044.499e82d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , John Stultz On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 01:10:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > arch/mips/kernel/i8253.c between commit 2b9b7cd782a5 ("clocksource: > convert mips to generic i8253 clocksource") from the arm tree and commit > 75c4fd8c7862 ("mips: convert to clocksource_register_hz/khz") from the > tip tree. > > The former seems to supercede the latter, so I used the former. That's the right resolution, thanks! Ralf