From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:19:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20110516091927.GK30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110513131437.8999e8eb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110513080634.GA13647@elte.hu> <20110513083738.GA19733@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110513092646.GK13647@elte.hu> <20110513213640.GB30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110516073144.GF24836@elte.hu> <20110516074230.GI30539@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110516091744.GB12325@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:47795 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752527Ab1EPJUN (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2011 05:20:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110516091744.GB12325@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz , Jacob Pan , Glauber Costa , Dimitri Sivanich , Rusty Russell , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris McDermott , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:17:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Since in the sentence you quote i only repeated what you said above (that you > keep commits in Git from before when they are posted: i do that too for > development) i have trouble following your line of thought of how you could > possibly have concluded that i'm "not listening". I'm saying you're not listening because I've described the workflow, I've told you that what appeared in linux-next was still subject to change, and yet _you) persist in telling me that what I put in there was the "final" commit. That doesn't make it seem like you're listening.