From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: build warningiIn Linus' tree Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 21:23:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20110530192344.GA5393@elte.hu> References: <20110530114828.8ef6625b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110530073445.GA27557@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60782 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317Ab1E3TYi (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2011 15:24:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Brown, Len" Cc: Len Brown , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton * Brown, Len wrote: > Alan convinced me that the community doesn't move that fast, and > that we should wallow in the swill for a while longer before > deleting. [...] Yeah, it's much nicer this way. > [...] Others volunteered to test the latest upstream kernel on APM > hardware, giving APM's presence in the upstream kernel a life line. > So all I did was add the recommended feature-removal's and warnings > for the stuff which obviously should go. But if you see some of > your favorite bits on the chopping block, you have at least 6 > months to make a case for them :-) :-) I only saw one of the runtime warnings on one of my testboxes - i adjusted the boot parameter setting (the parameter was bogus) and moved on. So life can go on as far as i'm involved :-) Thanks, Ingo