From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110619.223615.454360261348822405.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110609145657.96fae0d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110615085617.949d418f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110620145807.9c202509.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:58668 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751075Ab1FTFi1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:38:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110620145807.9c202509.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, adobriyan@gmail.com From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:58:07 +1000 > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:56:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:56:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> I think that this patch would probably apply to just the net-next tree >> anyway. > > Ping. Sorry, this slipped through the cracks, I'll take care of this right now.