From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tmem tree with the xen-two tree Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:06:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20110622140642.GD5574@dumpdata.com> References: <20110622144611.a900a000.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:34518 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932196Ab1FVOHA (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:07:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110622144611.a900a000.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dan Magenheimer , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:46:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tmem tree got a conflict in > drivers/xen/Kconfig drivers/xen/tmem.c between commit afec6e04922d ("xen: > prepare tmem shim to handle frontswap") from the xen-two tree and commit > ac33c46b42ba ("xen: enable frontswap for Xen tmem") from the tmem tree. > Dan, can you please rebase your #linux-next branch on my #linux-next branch so that Stephen's awesome build engine can chug along for this? Thanks! > I just used the xen-two versions of these files (as they look newer). OK, we will sort this out.