From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 27 (uml) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:42:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20110627164259.GF11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20110627161656.688820b9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110627082733.75e58ae4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <201106271830.43698.richard@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201106271830.43698.richard@nod.at> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Jeff Dike , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:30:43PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Montag 27 Juni 2011, 17:27:33 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > Changes since 20110624: > > uml defconfig builds on x86 (32-bit and 64-bit) fail with: > > > > fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:756: error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this > > function) > > Hmm, "->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to ->permission()" is the evil doer. > Al? Gyah... s/mask/desired/ in that line. Will fold...