From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 27 (uml) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:30:43 +0200 Message-ID: <201106271830.43698.richard@nod.at> References: <20110627161656.688820b9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110627082733.75e58ae4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:53499 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752756Ab1F0Qaz (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:30:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110627082733.75e58ae4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Jeff Dike , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Am Montag 27 Juni 2011, 17:27:33 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Changes since 20110624: > uml defconfig builds on x86 (32-bit and 64-bit) fail with: > > fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:756: error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this > function) Hmm, "->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to ->permission()" is the evil doer. Al? Thanks, //richard