From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:18:06 -0700
Message-ID: <20110629141806.GB16986@kroah.com>
References: <20110629162454.e2326fcf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:45115 "EHLO
	out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751363Ab1F2OSS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:18:18 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110629162454.e2326fcf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 04:24:54PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20110628:
> 
> My fixes tree is empty again (the early part of mmotm-2011-06-22-13-05 is
> mostly now included in Linus' tree and the experiment failed anyway :-))

Did it fail?  I thought it at least solved the build errors that people
were seeing in the staging tree in other arches, allowing them to move
on to other, "real" issues that they had.

Thanks for doing it, I appreciated it at the least.

greg k-h