From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat_ioctl: fix make headers_check regression Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:11:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20110706161132.c393b685.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20110704134842.7ab89126.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110704100316.GA15894@sig21.net> <20110706225140.GA21510@sig21.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54875 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752025Ab1GFXMJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 19:12:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110706225140.GA21510@sig21.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Johannes Stezenbach Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Jens Axboe , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:51:40 +0200 Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:03:16PM +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > Fix headers_check error introduced by 390192b30057: > > > > include/linux/fd.h:6: included file 'linux/compat.h' is not exported > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach > > --- > > I used the same style as in linux/usbdevice_fs.h, hope > > that's OK. > > > I just got an "added to -mm tree" mail for the original patch, so I > wonder what's with this fix? What does the "original patch" refer to. Also, there's no commit 390192b30057. Commit ID's can change. This is why we ask people to also include the patch title when describing patches by SHA ID's Please let's just start again. Tell us what is going on here.