From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the ext4 tree Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:39:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20110718223909.GE2312@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20110716212838.a84936541c18fb866abcc308@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:49390 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750846Ab1GRWjM (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:39:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110716212838.a84936541c18fb866abcc308@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Lai Jiangshan On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 09:28:38PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in > fs/jbd2/journal.c between commit 4862fd6047ed ("jbd2: remove > jbd2_dev_to_name() from jbd2 tracepoints") from the ext4 tree and commit > a5e245951e94 ("jbd2,rcu: Convert call_rcu(free_devcache) to kfree_rcu()") > from the rcu tree. > > The former removes the function modified by the latter, so I did that. I now have removed that patch in -rcu as well. Thanx, Paul