From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:54:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20110801145422.cccff7aa.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20110801144732.7f5204b219f628f2a2a63b0c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.54.6]:46218 "HELO oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752473Ab1HAVyY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:54:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Sedat Dilek , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Stephen Boyd , Andrew Morton On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:01:21 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just in case anyone needs reminding: =A0Please do not add anything = destined > > for v3.2 into linux-next included trees until after v3.1-rc1. > > > > The powerpc allyesconfig build (at least) fails today. > > > > Changes since 20110729: > > > > Linus' tree still lost its build failure. > > > > The v4l-dvb tree lost its conflicts. > > > > The kgdb tree gained a build failure for which I reverted 3 commits= =2E > > > > The moduleh tree gained a conflict against the slabe-dma tree but l= ost > > its build failures (except for a few remaining merge fixups). > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------= --------- > > >=20 > Just FYI: mmotm-tree still misses the fixup-patch from [1]. >=20 > - Sedat - >=20 > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1021602/ Yes, I am applying this patch daily (among others). :( Acked-by: Randy Dunlap --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your cod= e ***