From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux next: Native Linux KVM tool inclusion request
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:39:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20110823003925.GA30253@infradead.org>
References: <1314044960.3668.9.camel@lappy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:53928
	"EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753934Ab1HWAje (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:39:34 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1314044960.3668.9.camel@lappy>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:29:20PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
> 
> I would like to ask you to include the Native Linux KVM tool in the
> linux-next tree.

What has changed over the last rejection of it?  Again, I'm not against
the tool, but there is no reason to throw it into the kernel tree with
a completely misleading name.