From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the mfd tree Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:16:33 +0200 Message-ID: <201108240016.33529.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20110823135619.be8b64d2eec7cb78bc0160a8@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:32926 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754712Ab1HWWOp (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:14:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110823135619.be8b64d2eec7cb78bc0160a8@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Samuel Ortiz , Mark Brown On Tuesday, August 23, 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c between commit 99efe0d4c992 ("mfd: Drop the > twl4030-irq kthread") from the mfd tree and commit febab68efa45 > ("freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly") from the pm > tree. > > The former dropped the code modified by the latter, so I did that. Thanks! Unfortunately, I don't think we can really fix that other that making one tree depend on the other.