From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ptrace tree related) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:16:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20110824151631.GA11827@redhat.com> References: <20110823160309.112ad0f4922be8605b61c8dd@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31764 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750917Ab1HXPTd (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:19:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110823160309.112ad0f4922be8605b61c8dd@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming , David Miller Hi Stephen, sorry for delay. On 08/23, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig) > failed like this: > > kernel/signal.c: In function 'block_sigmask': > kernel/signal.c:2333:26: error: 'SA_NODEFER' undeclared (first use in this function) > > Caused by commit 932e5a25b9cf ("signal: Add block_sigmask() for adding > sigmask to current->blocked"). Yes. My bad. I've reset this commit. > Sparc seems to use SA_NOMASK in the > equivalent bit of code and has no SA_NODEFER definition. Yes, I'll push the updated patch(es). Thanks! Oleg.