From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 22 (evm) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:01:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20110902080134.be3db10d.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20110822145304.980529cb921e5f1321c622da@canb.auug.org.au> <20110822125355.bb01d76b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110822174958.73dd96c7.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1314065358.3225.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110823164035.ca28fdc6.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1314362342.3224.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110826100011.9213d872.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1314927625.3058.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.20]:47151 "HELO oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752548Ab1IBPBi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:01:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnaud Lacombe Cc: Mimi Zohar , Stephen Rothwell , Mimi Zohar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:21:16 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Mimi Zohar = wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 20:32 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:39:02 -0400 Mimi Zohar wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 22:10 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > >> >>> > Hi, > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> >>> > > I think that you are going to need to do something like Ar= naud suggested > >> >>> > > and use "depends on TCG_TPM=3Dy" instead of just "depends = on TCG_TPM", > >> >>> > > unless you can convince someone that this is a kconfig bug= =2E > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > dammit... I guess there is... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > If you consider the following Kconfig: [snip] > >> >>> > I would have expected CONFIG_C and CONFIG_C0 to be 'y', just= as 'E'. > >> >>> > If you remove D's dependency on 'A', everything works as exp= ected. So > >> >>> > it would seem direct dependency state influence the state of= reverse > >> >>> > dependencies... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Will have a look... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > =A0- Arnaud > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks for looking into this! =A0Instead of changing 'TCG_TPM'= to > >> >>> 'TCG_TPM=3Dy', the dependency should be on 'TRUSTED_KEYS=3Dy'.= =A0Then when > >> >>> I've refactored ENCRYPTED_KEYS, removing the ENCRYPTED_KEYS de= pendency > >> >>> on TRUSTED_KEYS, the EVM dependency would be '(TRUSTED_KEYS=3D= y || > >> >>> TRUSTED_KEYS=3Dn)'. =A0Do you want a temporary fix for now? > >> >> > >> >> Yes, linux-next (randconfig) builds are still failing, so we ne= ed something > >> >> to prevent that. > >> >> > >> > you may want to try: > >> > > >> > git://github.com/lacombar/linux-2.6.git master/kconfig/expr-woes > >> > > >> ping ? > >> > >> =A0- Arnaud > > > > I assume you want me to test using expr-woes, but I'm not how. =A0C= ould > > you help me here a bit. > > > > (Over the weekend I removed encrypted keys dependency on TCG_TPM.) > > > Well, at this point, this is not really related to the particular > issue, but to kconfig more generally. I guess I'll just post the > patches on LKML and see if they triggers non-wanted regression. Yes, please do that. > Thanks, > - Arnaud >=20 > > thanks, > > > > Mimi > > > >> > only the last commit is relevant to the problem, but depend on o= ne > >> > another to get . The rest aims at tidying the expr stu= ff. > >> > I'm looking for regression it may have introduced. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > =A0- Arnaud > >> > > >> > ps: I'll most likely be AFK until sunday evening (to be conserva= tive). --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your cod= e ***