From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: Temporary -rcu tree location Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:06:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20110913040647.GC2313@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20110913000107.GA15945@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110913002419.GN2362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110913013400.GB2313@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110913120716.1b893c483ee91d6b7f12a5b4@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:39937 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715Ab1IMEG7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:06:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110913120716.1b893c483ee91d6b7f12a5b4@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Jiri Kosina , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:07:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:34:00 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > > > there doesn't seem to be 'rcu/next' branch, right? > > > > No, there is not. So the idea is to push "rcu/next" the first time, > > then ":rcu/next" thereafter? > > Can't you just do a (forced) push over and over again without removing > the branch each time? I will give it a try on the next update. ;-) Thanx, Paul