From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:14:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110927131426.GA21897@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110927151454.9892b23391f20bea20741c21@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:14:54AM -0400, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c between commit b77e70bf3535 ("x86, mce:
> Replace MCE_SELF_VECTOR by irq_work") from Linus' tree and commit
> ef14aea88fee ("x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter()") from the rcu
> tree.
>
> The commit in Linus' tree seem to superced the need for the rcu tree
> patch ... so I effectively dropped the rcu tree change to this file.
Yes, this is correct.
@Frederic, Paul: you guys could probably redo the patch without the
<arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c> hunk or leave it like this and let
Linus know about the conflict when sending the pull request during the
merge window...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-27 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 5:14 linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-17 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-18 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-08 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-08 15:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-12 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-12 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-18 3:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 3:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 14:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-15 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-26 3:00 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-26 3:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-26 3:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08 0:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-30 0:32 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-30 10:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-03-30 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 22:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-06 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 6:04 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 12:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-10-06 2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-06 4:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110927131426.GA21897@aftab \
--to=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).