From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Baron Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 24 (dynamic_debug) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:27:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20110927132718.GA2533@redhat.com> References: <20110824160404.ebad6370aee2cad82a990142@canb.auug.org.au> <20110824102551.8fc076b5.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110824193244.GA2540@redhat.com> <20110824124248.13aa3ed4.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110824210902.GA9648@kroah.com> <20110926231702.GA16827@huya.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1039 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485Ab1I0N10 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:27:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110926231702.GA16827@huya.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Brown , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Randy Dunlap , Greg KH , Stephen Rothwell , Bart Van Assche , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:17:02PM -0700, David Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:09:02PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:42:48PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:32:45 -0400 Jason Baron wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:25:51AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:04:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > When CONFIG_NET is not enabled (I see this on i386 builds): > > > > > > > > > > lib/built-in.o: In function `__dynamic_netdev_dbg': > > > > > (.text+0x9fda): undefined reference to `__netdev_printk' > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > ~Randy > > > > > *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** > > > > > > > > Ok, we probably want something, like below, although something keeps > > > > selecting CONFIG_NET, when I try to unset it, in my .config...so not yet > > > > tested, but should work. > > > > > > Yes, that works. Thanks. > > > > > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > > > > Nice. > > > > Jason, care to resend this, with a proper signed-off-by, so that I can > > apply it to fix this build error? > > Any status on this, Jason? This seems to still be broken in > linux-next. > > Thanks, > David > Yes, this needs to be resolved asap. I'm sending this to Andrew Morton b/c these patches have been merged in the -mm tree. I'm guessing that b/c of the kernel.org outage they aren't showing up in -next? Since this has dragged on and on, perhaps, those patches can be moved somewhere else so they can be pulled into -next. Andrew? Thanks, -Jason