From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Temporary relocation of the regulator tree Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:38:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20111007123842.GF14518@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20111007114046.GA24534@sirena.org.uk> <20111007233607.dfaf5622a5001c594163d41f@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:49812 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752498Ab1JGMip (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:38:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111007233607.dfaf5622a5001c594163d41f@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:36:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:40:46 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > > Due to a combination of the kernel.org downtime and an intensely busy > > time at work for Liam can you please change the regulator tree in -next > > to be: > > git://opensource.wolfsonmicro.com/regulator.git for-next > > until Liam manages to get sufficient free time to keep up with the day > > to day flow again. > OK, I will switch to that tree from Tuesday (Monday is a holiday) unless > Liam screams. I have also added you as a contact for this tree (called > voltage in linux-next - would it be better to call it regulator?). It should be called regulator, the code is all called regulator. I never understood why you'd labelled it voltage :)