linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the pci-current tree
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:52:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111216085247.GA28302@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111216133026.8bac235bb8495cfd8669b761@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:30:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the iommu tree got a conflict in
> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c between commit 619a5182d1f3 ("PCI
> hotplug: Always allow acpiphp to handle non-PCIe bridges") from the
> pci-current tree and commit d90116ea38f7 ("PCI/ACPI: Make acpiphp ignore
> root bridges using SHPC native hotplug") from the iommu tree.

That's weird. This conflict is between a patch in my tree which I pulled
in from the PCI tree and another patch from the PCI tree. So any
conflict should already be solved in the PCI tree, no?

Jesse, the pri-changes branch you provided me is a subset of your
linux-next branch, right?

> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Jesse should comment on the correctness of the fix :)


	Joerg

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-16  2:30 linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the pci-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-16  8:52 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-12-16 15:18   ` Jesse Barnes
2011-12-16 15:30     ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111216085247.GA28302@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).