From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:24:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20111219152409.3a2c213e@de.ibm.com> References: <20111219154010.c2044c038a6174dd8fb6f477@canb.auug.org.au> <20111219080813.GB30432@elte.hu> <20111219101134.3c2c0db5@de.ibm.com> <20111219103513.GA17928@elte.hu> <20111219112547.GA32375@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.114]:53539 "EHLO e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751779Ab1LSOYP (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:24:15 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:24:14 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111219112547.GA32375@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:25:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > All of it including "[S390] cputime: add sparse checking and > > > cleanup" or just the fix for uptime ? > > > > I suspect we can take it all if it's all scheduling/time > > related, and add new patches to sched/core to keep it all > > concentrated in a single tree? > > Btw., i'd suggest to keep your commits as-is and merge > tip:sched/core into your tree - and send the result to me so > that we can make that the new sched/core. > > That way your commits are preserved and the conflicts are > resolved. Just did that and pushed out the result on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git cputime-tip Pulling either the original tip sched/core branch or the cputime-tip branch to an up-to-date repository fails by the way, it gives a conflict in kernel/sched/fair.c. And then there is the thing with cpustat being u64. It really should be cputime64_t. How do you want that resolved, I assume an additional patch on top? -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.