From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:02:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111221190211.GE11842@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EF23A1F.60803@xenotime.net>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:57:19AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 08:39 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 12:44 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20111216:
> >>
> >>
> >> (not new today, just not reported earlier)
> > John applied my fix for this one. It should be fixed now.
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Is this supposed to be fixed in linux-next?
> It still fails today (linux-next 20111221).
>
>
> data.c:(.text+0x3e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> data.c:(.text+0x400): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> ntf.c:(.text+0xb60): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> ntf.c:(.text+0xb80): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> rsp.c:(.text+0x750): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> rsp.c:(.text+0x770): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> netlink.c:(.text+0x14e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> netlink.c:(.text+0x1500): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> af_nfc.c:(.text+0xe0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> af_nfc.c:(.text+0x100): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
> rawsock.c:(.text+0x1000): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
> rawsock.c:(.text+0x1020): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
I have this commit in wireless-next, been there a couple of days:
commit 645d35902c8f05a1b12fa838aa9052d8eeaf161e
Author: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri Dec 16 15:03:36 2011 +0100
NFC: Fix LLCP related build failure
llcp_mac routines should be static and inlined or build will fail with NFC
selected without LLCP.
This patch fixes:
LD [M] net/nfc/nfc.o
net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
netlink.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
netlink.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down':
rawsock.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up':
rawsock.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up'
net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 7:55 linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-19 20:32 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (xen) Randy Dunlap
2011-12-19 20:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-19 20:38 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (staging/media/go7007) Randy Dunlap
2011-12-19 20:44 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc) Randy Dunlap
2011-12-20 16:39 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-20 20:14 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-21 19:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-21 19:02 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2011-12-21 20:20 ` Randy Dunlap
[not found] ` <4EF23A1F.60803-/UHa2rfvQTnk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-21 20:42 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-21 21:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-21 23:35 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-12-22 1:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-12-22 1:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 1:52 ` linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 Mark Brown
2011-12-20 3:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 6:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-20 11:54 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111221190211.GE11842@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=samuel@sortiz.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).